Structure and Practice of Familial Based...

I think that this article has a lot to do with the first one I read about juries deciding who should be killed or not. I spoke about how jurors have such a hard decision deciding which capital punishment inmates deserve to die for their crimes. I spoke about how prejudice and racism could have an affect on who votes for death for who. It's the same way with this issue.

Many people argue whether jurors seeing a woman in the defendant's seat will help or hurt her chances. I look it at it the same way as before, as any juror has the capacity to be racist, prejudist or subsconciously make a poor decison. That's just how it goes. The same can happen when a woman happens to be sitting in the court room. Some jurors make take it easy. And others might get upset and be more harsh. My point is that noone can tell and there are no pattern.s The court is just too sensitve and the jurors even more.

I do agree with the notion that woman with children or woman with disabilities or disease will be favored more. This has to do with the part of compassion and emotion that is relevant in any court room no matter what. Judges take this sensitivity on that I was speaking about now and make their biased decisions from that. That is no different than a juror deciding an outcome as well.

In this article I was upset with all the numbers and responses to interviews. That wasn't the information I was looking for again. The study done here looked at these gender issues and stayed completely inside the box. I was a little bored with that and needed to make my own conclusions and think about my own ideas.